Why don't people in power talk about the obvious most important things?
during the 2024 presidential campaign, both Kamala Harris and Donald Trump seemed to struggle to find topics that would sway voters to them. Harris promised to provide $25,000 toward first-home purchases, alluding to the shortage of housing. Trump, sticking to his anti-immigration theme, worried that that immigrants to the US are “eating the dogs, they're eating the cats” in a small town in Ohio. Both candidates steered clear of the most obvious and important topics. I'd like to shine a light on what they should have been focusing on.
The writers of the US Constitution stated their goal was “in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.” Housing and illegal immigration do fit in there, but I submit that there are more clear and important areas to consider.
Climate IS talked about, which is good. But what was said is not. While Trump called protecting the environment a “green new scam,” Kamala Harris has said she will “unite Americans to tackle the climate crisis.” Not a lot of detail in either campaign though.
Now on to the easy ones.
The US has about 5000 nuclear weapons. Why? The cost for upgrading and maintaining these weapons is estimated to be $756 billlion over the next 10 years. (https://www.cbo.gov/publication/59054) Let's negotiate again with our “enemies” and cut this down to about 100 nukes. Savings: about $700 billion, and probably the salvation of our species.
Here are the countries that don't have universal health care: the US, South Africa, Iran, Egypt, Nigeria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syria, Yemen, China. https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/10-notable-countries-that-are-still-without-universal-healthcare.html Our own NIH says universal health care is about 13% cheaper than private health care. This is a savings of about $450 billion per year. It's simpler and more equitable.
Growing inequality is a danger to our democracy. Are we going back to the time when the kings and princes lived in their castles, and the rest of us peons scraped by in our hovels outside the castle walls? It seems so. Tax the money hoarders. There is no reason that any one person needs more than $10 million (using that as an arbitrary limit). Consider the tax rates in the 1950s, and look at how much better off the middle class relatively was then. Single breadwinners in each family, most households could afford a car, a home, and higher education. And the rich? Despite tax rates of up to 90%, the rich somehow stayed relatively wealthy. https://youtu.be/q2gO4DKVpa8?si=7rPGCe4M3XI5O3C3
The US debt, $36.1 trillion, is a huge anchor on our economy. As with any household, if you're just paying off your debt instead of paying for improving your life, you are stuck in quicksand. This huge debt requires a huge percentage of our GDP just to pay for our past, not our future. https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/americas-finance-guide/national-debt/
There is a little talk about the homeless, about the housing shortage, about the lack of healthcare for some, etc. All this should just be bundled into one point: there should be a baseline for all people below which we strive to let no one fall. This baseline means not that people can dawdle around and still live comfortably. It means that those who are temporarily or permananently unable to support themselves will not have to live hungry and cold under a bridge somewhere. Once this baseline is reasonably calculated, the argmnents from then on should only be about how to make sure people do not scam the system.
All corporations should be Benefit corporations (i.e. have to be of benefit to society). No longer should our capitalist system allow a corporation to gain profits by making the world less habitable. No longer should corporations be able to exploit the citizens so they can have fancier cars. A Benefit corporation must not only strive to give a profit to their shareholders, but must show that their activities also benefit society in general. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benefit_corporation
Plastics are everywhere. Plastics are inside our bodies, at the bottom of the ocean, and in just about every product made. About 380 million tons of plastic products are made every year. In contrast, all humans alive today weigh about 600 million tons. We will not only drown ourselves and the planet in plastic, but it is also invading our bodies and our food. Why? For profit and convenience. Humans, we may soon find out, prefer convenience to self preservation.
We try to help the planet by working on our energy use. We make appliances and vehicles that use less energy. We switch to sources of energy that are safer for the planet. And yet, our use of energy is growing exponentially. And besides all the people on earth who are beginning to also have access to cheaper energy, we also have energy gobblers popping up. Crypto currency, for example, uses about the same amount of electricity as the nation of the Netherlands. Crypto mining requires enormous amounts of computers working 24/7 on calculations to create crypto wealth. Artificial intelligence (AI) applications have also massive computation requirements, which again suck up enormous amounts of electricity. And why? So we can make cute videos of cats playing piano or some silly thing? AI is being used in more and more industries, so more and more computing and energy hogging will be coming our way. As we try to switch to safer energy sources, we may not be able to keep up with expanding energy demands even if we keep our carbon guzzling power plants. Does anybody talk about this? No.
So I can see why people are tired of how our country is run at this time. Our politicians talk about everything under the sun except the most important topics. Trump, for example, brought up an immigrant problem he perceived in one town in Ohio during the presidential debates. Really? Nothing more important to bring up? Harris promised $25,000 to new home buyers. Really? Who still could afford a house? And where will these non-existent houses spring up?
We cannot let our politicans and power brokers steer us away from the bigger problems we are facing. They are obvious. They are existential problems. They will affect our country for generations. And they all have solutions. We must hold those in power accountable and require them to deal with the obvious problems first. I don't offer solutions here. I offer the direction we should look and the things we should see that are actually right in front of our eyes every day, if we'd only take the time to notice.
No comments:
Post a Comment